The Incidence Of High Ply Counts In Early Cotton Warps
A simpler explanation seems worthy of consideration. I would like to postulate that the incidence of machine plied warp type warps is in and of its self an indication of the occurrence of machine plying of cotton warps at an earlier point than heretofore popularly accepted. Obviously machine plied warps would indicate the existence of domestic Mughal warp plying machinery since we have not found commercial record to substantiate an import trade trade in machine spun cotton cord of the type suitable for use as warps. Turing to our PMA data pool a scan indicated one match for an apparent spinning device that we can date to the pre 1850 period. So forgive when I say the evidence is "marginal" at best. Detail from the margin of a page in the Golshan Album.Attributed to Nar Singh, Mughal India, circa 1605 1.
This image of a spinning machine is found in the margin decoration on a page of Nastaliq calligraphy that can be attributed to the first few years of the Seventeenth century. Personally I have to suspect that this machine or one very much like it was the source of Z6S and Z8S warps in the Widner Mughal Animal carpet. In 1983 3. Eiland further explores the warp question and we can see where he develops the much harder line as to the attribution of high ply count warped Mughal Carpets. While I side with Ellis on this question it is fascinating to see the process by which Eiland seeks to establish the facts. Eiland's process to both qualify and quantify his data prior to conclusion is an inspiration as is his willingness to re-evaluate when circumstances dictate. While pondering the implications of high ply count warps I went through a number of sources looking for classical Persian carpets with these warps. In the literature I noted the Ballard Saph 4. which is listed as Multi-Niche Prayer rug or saph and is attributed to Persia or Mughal India. I feel it is Mughal and have attributed it as such to Lahore. In going through the literature I have come to the conclusion that high ply count warped rugs fall into one of three groups. There is the Lahore Mughal type, and there are those that have cabled warps which I will discuss in a moment, all the other rugs that do not fall into these groups appear to date to 1850 or later. Cabled WarpsThere is however a group of carpets that that has high ply count cotton warps and yet are not structurally related to the rest of our group. These unrelated pieces have high ply count cotton warps that are cabled. Cabling is where plied thread is plied again giving a cord that typically has a S Z S spin pattern. Cabling is the way a hand spinner plier would normally make a larger heavier strand. Two rugs in my study The Berlin Spiral Tendril Carpet and An atypical Masnad stand out as cabled warped. The Berlin carpet is apparently a Mughal carpet and is related on stylistic grounds. The TM rug appears not to be a Mughal and I have chosen to call it Turanian. It is also interesting to note that the Bier Rug has S6 blue wefts. The use of 6 unplied strands in one single weft is rather unusual and not something I expect to see in Mughal rugs. Links To Related Mughal CarpetsThe Berlin Spiral Tendril Carpet Technical Analyses Getty Mughal Animal Rug Technical Description The Getty Mughal Shrub Carpet Technical Description Not found yet Green Ground Mughal Carpet Fragment Mughal Fighting Elephant Fragment Mughal Vak-Vak Type A Not found yet Sackville Mughal Animal Carpet Vojtech Blau Mughal Animal Carpet Widner Animal Carpet Technical Description Mughal Polonaise Carpets with Ply Counts of Five or More. The Getty Mughal Rug of the Polonaise Type Silk and Metallic Thread "Polonaise" Rug Silk Mughal Rug of the Polonaise Type Links to Unrelated Carpets with High Ply Count Cotton Warps The Widener Mughal Animal Carpet, Return to Oriental Rug Review Home Page 1. Soudavar, Abolala. Art of the Persian Court. (New York: Rizzoli, 1992) p. 306 and Plate 128a 2. F. R. Martin, "A History Of Oriental Carpets Before 1800." Oriental Rug Review Vol. VI, No. 3 June 1986 p. 17/65a. 3. Murray Eiland Jr. Oriental Rug Review Vol. III, No. 8 November 1983 p. 4, 5, and 6 4. Mackie, Louise. Prayer Rugs. (Washington DC: Textile Museum, 1974), p. 86. 5. Beattie, May H. Carpets of Central Persia. (Sheffield: World Of Islam Festival, 1976), Insert. For Further Reading: Thanks and best wishes, J. Barry O'Connell Jr. |
||||||||